Third Party Intervention

Page 1 of 2

Filter category

Feature post image

Guatemala’s Application to Intervene in the Sapodilla Cayes Case: An Impermissible Intervention by an Indispensable Party?

The International Court of Justice recently heard oral arguments by Guatemala, Belize and Honduras on Guatemala’s application to intervene under Article 62 of the Statute in the case concerning Sovereignty over the Sapodilla Cayes (Belize v Honduras). Guatemala’s prima facie grounds for intervention are straightforward: it is one of the three parties (in addition to Belize and Honduras) to a tripartite sovereignty dispute over the Sapodilla Cayes. Therefore, Guatemala has argued that “a decision of the Court that “Belize is sovereign over the Sapodilla Cayes”, as Belize requests, would inevitably affect Guatemala’s legal interests and rights with respect to these island” (Intervention Application, para. 9).

Read more

Further Legal Consequences of Obligations Erga Omnes (Partes) in the ICJ Climate Change Advisory Opinion: Duty of Non-Recognition and Article 62 Intervention

In its Climate Change Advisory Opinion, the International Court of Justice held that certain climate-related obligations of States under customary international law and climate change treaties are erga omnes (partes). One important consequence – as the Court explicitly confirmed – is that States can invoke each other’s responsibility for breaching those climate obligations. As Paddeu and…

Read more

Serbia ≠ Fidji? or: What happened to Serbia’s Intervention in the Case concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Sudan v. United Arab Emirates)

I. Introduction Certain aspects and the (then still potential) outcome of the ICJ Case concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in Sudan (Sudan v. United Arab Emirates) were already discussed on this blog here and here, including the issue of…

Read more

Another Genocide Convention case, another conundrum for interventions

On 5 March 2025, Sudan instituted proceedings against the United Arab Emirates (UAE) before the International Court of Justice (ICJ) regarding alleged violations by the UAE of its obligations under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide (the Genocide Convention). The case concerns allegations that the UAE is supporting Sudan’s paramilitary Rapid Support Forces against…

Read more

Interventions in Ukraine v Russia: Plus ça change?

On 6 August 2024, the International Court of Justice issued a press release relating to the pending Ukraine v. Russia case titled “Declarations of intervention under Article 63 of the Statute of the Court for the purposes of the merits stage of the proceedings”. The Court announced that, of the 32 states which had previously…

Read more