Iraq

Page 1 of 8

Filter category

Feature post image

When Government Lawyers Say No

There are times when government lawyers (including military legal advisors) are faced with a stark choice. Their political masters (or their superiors in the military) are clearly set on pursing a certain course of action that seems pretty patently illegal. The stakes are exceptionally high, including very possibly in lives lost. The pressure of raw power is overwhelming. Should the lawyer become (or continue being) an apologist for that raw power, crafting some kind legalistic rationale to justify a decision already made? Or should they just say no, this is illegal and you can’t do it? Most government lawyers are not routinely, or ever, faced with this kind of choice. To be sure, most government lawyering involves decisions on (il)legality, or plausible legality and legal risk, and government lawyers will frequently say no, this can’t be done – but in a great majority of cases the stakes will be fairly low, and provision of advice will simply be part of the bureaucratic machine doing its work. Yes, there will be friction, but nothing existential.

Read more

Threat of ICJ Claim Based on Soleimani Assassination Remains a Card in Iran’s Hand

The United States’ military operation against Iran has raised important questions about the legality of the strike and potential fora in which Iran could bring claims against the United States. Although, as recently argued on this blog, the International Court of Justice (“ICJ”) may not have jurisdiction to hear Iran’s claims based on the United…

Read more

An Effective Form of Judicial Treatment of Foreign Terrorist Fighters in Kosovo?

Introduction Following the defeat of Islamic State in 2018 in Syria, thousands of Europeans accused of fighting for ISIS remain detained in Kurdish jails in Syria, while women and children related to these fighters are also living in several camps nearby the Iraqi border. Due to the absence of adequate infrastructure, some ISIS fighters are imprisoned in schools…

Read more

Mistakes of Fact When Using Lethal Force in International Law: Part III

  To briefly recapitulate our examination of mistake of fact when using lethal force in various sub-fields of international law: such a doctrine is, in its purely subjective form, black letter law in international criminal law. It is also established (even if not labelled as such) in international human rights law and (somewhat less clearly) in international humanitarian…

Read more

Mistakes of Fact When Using Lethal Force in International Law: Part II

  If a state believes that it is the target of an ongoing or imminent armed attack and uses force to repel that attack, but it later turns out that it was mistaken and that there either was no such attack or that there was no necessity to respond to it, is that use of force in putative…

Read more