War Crimes

Page 1 of 14

Filter category

Feature post image

The US Sanctions Against the ICC

Some two hours after the Nobel Prize Committee announced the award of the Peace Prize to Navi Pillay for her work on international law and the establishment of international accountability for atrocity crimes, the US government struck back.  Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced a significant escalation in the US campaign against the International Criminal Court (ICC). ‘Either the ICC will end its threats, or we will end the ICC,’ he declared. This contribution considers the underlying legal tension, analyses a series of steps in the escalating US policy against the Court, and considers the response by its supporters. An international constitutional clash The US objection to the powers of the ICC resonates with a core principle of the classical international system that has persisted to this day. That principle holds that no state can be subjected to an international mechanism to authoritatively determine whether or not it is in compliance with the legal rules it has accepted, unless it specifically consents. Hence, the…

Read more

A peace treaty for Ukraine: Mini-symposium on international legal issues

In the four years since Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine, the prospects of a negotiated peace settlement have waxed but mostly waned. But the possibility of an agreement has been an ongoing focus for international lawyers. This is primarily because Russia has demanded territorial concessions from Ukraine that appear at odds with…

Read more

War Crimes without a War Crimes Statute? The Shajareh Tayyebeh Minab School Attack and the Possibility of Domestic Prosecution of Serious Violations of IHL in Iranian Courts

Introduction The initiation of criminal complaints concerning the attack by the US armed forces on the Shajareh Tayyebeh primary school in Minab has brought a doctrinal issue of direct practical relevance before Iranian prosecutorial authorities. The complaints filed by victims’ families transform what would otherwise remain an abstract question of international humanitarian law (IHL)…

Read more

Domestic Courts and the States’ Obligation to Prevent Genocide and Serious Violations of IHL: The Brussels Court of Appeal’s Interlocutory Judgment of 16 March 2026

On 16 March 2026, the Brussels Court of Appeal (hereafter, the “Court”) issued an interlocutory judgment in summary proceedings (référé) concerning the alleged failure of the Belgian State to comply with its international obligations in relation to the risk of genocide and serious violations of international humanitarian law (“IHL”) in Gaza (hereafter, the “Judgment”).  The…

Read more

Two(ish) Weeks in Review: 6 April—1 May 2026

In a slightly extended version of Two Weeks in Review, we take in fundamental questions about what happens when law and lawyers seek or refuse to justify illegal actions, “relocation orders” issued by Israel in Gaza and Lebanon, the closing of the Strait of Hormuz, Australian soldiers and Belgian consular officials in domestic courts for international crimes, the…

Read more
  • Page 1 of 14
  • Last