International Humanitarian Law

Page 2 of 94

Filter category

Feature post image

Location, Location, Location: The UK Supreme Court’s Judgment in Shehabi v. Bahrain

In August 2022, I co-authored a post on the English case of Al-Masarir v. Saudi Arabia [2022] EWHC 2199, where Knowles J held that Saudi Arabia had no immunity under Section 5 of the UK State Immunity Act 1978 (‘UK SIA’) for its use of Pegasus spyware to hack the devices of Mr Al-Masarir, a human rights activist located in the UK. Four years later, the UK Supreme Court handed down its long-awaited judgment in Bahrain v. Shehabi [2026] UKSC 25, bringing an end to debates over whether States enjoy immunity under UK law for transboundary cyber espionage operations.

Read more

From Survival to Justice: A Conversation with Judge Theodor Meron

Few figures in international law have witnessed and influenced its development as much as Judge Theodor Meron. A Holocaust survivor who became a leading scholar, government legal adviser, diplomat and international judge, his unique reflections offer a first-hand account, built over decades of experience, of how international law is formed, interpreted, and applied under pressure.  I…

Read more

Two Weeks in Review: 29 June—10 July 2026

“The test of a first-rate intelligence,” according to F. Scott Fitzgerald, “is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in the mind at the same time, and still retain the ability to function.” For international lawyers in these times of the Board of Peace and the Gaza Riviera, this kind of functional cognitive dissonance has become less a…

Read more

A peace treaty for Ukraine: Mini-symposium on international legal issues

In the four years since Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine, the prospects of a negotiated peace settlement have waxed but mostly waned. But the possibility of an agreement has been an ongoing focus for international lawyers. This is primarily because Russia has demanded territorial concessions from Ukraine that appear at odds with…

Read more

Treatable Wounds, Untreated Law: What Modern Battlefield Medicine Tells Us About the Principle of Unnecessary Suffering

Introduction Advances in battlefield medicine have transformed the legal relevance of the principle of unnecessary suffering in international humanitarian law—but the legal community has not yet absorbed this transformation. For most of the history in which the relevant legal standards developed, certain vascular injuries caused in armed conflict were almost invariably fatal or resulted in amputation.

Read more