I am grateful to Professor d’Aspremont for his interesting and courteous response to my somewhat critical piece. I think we agree . . . that there is plenty on which we agree to differ! However, may I mention a few points? A minor linguistic matter: the terms ‘the logic of sources’ and ‘the logic of interpretation’…

Part II of a two-part post in the discussion of Jean d’Aspermont’s article, ‘The International Court of Justice, the Whales, and the Blurring of the Lines between Sources and Interpretation‘.   What did Japan say – and what did it not say? [Cont.] [...] What then does this single reference given tell us?…

Part I of a two-part post opening the discussion of Jean d'Aspermont's article, 'The International Court of Justice, the Whales, and the Blurring of the Lines between Sources and Interpretation'. The article by Professor Jean d’Aspremont, 'The International Court of Justice, the Whales, and the Blurring of the Lines between Sources…