We hope that readers have enjoyed our discussion of Daniel Peat’s Comparative Reasoning in International Courts and Tribunals. Many thanks to Daniel, Richard,…

In this symposium, Richard, Yvonne, and Antonios have all kindly taken the time to engage with some of the issues raised in Comparative Reasoning and I would like…

Lawyers are obsessed with interpretation and international lawyers are no exception. Perhaps there is a good reason for that, but that is not the point of this post.

Daniel Peat’s Comparative Reasoning in International Courts and Tribunals is a remarkable piece of scholarship in many respects, not least the breadth of its subject-matter. In advancing his…

Daniel Peat’s excellent study Comparative Reasoning in International Courts and Tribunals covers important issues in the interpretation of treaties. Its examination of how certain international courts and tribunals…

I Trying to distil six years of research, drafting, and revision into a pithy thousand-word blog post is a difficult task. But the challenge has provided me with…