<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The OLC Memoranda on Iraq: Revisiting the Case for War</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ejiltalk.org/the-olc-memoranda-on-iraq-revisiting-the-case-for-war/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ejiltalk.org/the-olc-memoranda-on-iraq-revisiting-the-case-for-war/</link>
	<description>Blog of the European Journal of International Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:55:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tran</title>
		<link>http://www.ejiltalk.org/the-olc-memoranda-on-iraq-revisiting-the-case-for-war/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>tran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ejiltalk.org/?p=327#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Why do you say that the Greenwood opinions were &quot;less apologetic&quot; than the OLC memos?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do you say that the Greenwood opinions were &#8220;less apologetic&#8221; than the OLC memos?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Gittings</title>
		<link>http://www.ejiltalk.org/the-olc-memoranda-on-iraq-revisiting-the-case-for-war/comment-page-1/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Gittings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 21:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ejiltalk.org/?p=327#comment-50</guid>
		<description>Reasonable? 

I think not, not at all -- and the confidence was more the brazen dishonesty of a con-man.

But your analysis is excellent Marko.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reasonable? </p>
<p>I think not, not at all &#8212; and the confidence was more the brazen dishonesty of a con-man.</p>
<p>But your analysis is excellent Marko.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

