<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ICTY Trial Chamber Suspends Seselj Trial</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ejiltalk.org/icty-trial-chamber-suspends-seselj-trial/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ejiltalk.org/icty-trial-chamber-suspends-seselj-trial/</link>
	<description>Blog of the European Journal of International Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:07:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vidan Hadzi-Vidanovic</title>
		<link>http://www.ejiltalk.org/icty-trial-chamber-suspends-seselj-trial/comment-page-1/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Vidan Hadzi-Vidanovic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ejiltalk.org/?p=606#comment-79</guid>
		<description>After this travesty of justice conducted by Seselj and with Judge Anoanetti as his first violin, one cannot but wonder what marvelous conclusions the Chamber will reach in the substantial part of its future Judgment (if some galactic force helps the actual delivery of it). If the Chamber was so incompetent in applying rudimentary procedural rules, what will be its answer on legal issue such as the treatment of hate speech in international law, which has already been partially destroyed through the &quot;competent&quot; reasonings in previous cases (See, for example, Kordic and Cerkez Trial Judgment, para. 209). 

At least we will have 100000000 pages of Seselj&#039;s views on 21st century racial theory written at the expense of the ICTY.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After this travesty of justice conducted by Seselj and with Judge Anoanetti as his first violin, one cannot but wonder what marvelous conclusions the Chamber will reach in the substantial part of its future Judgment (if some galactic force helps the actual delivery of it). If the Chamber was so incompetent in applying rudimentary procedural rules, what will be its answer on legal issue such as the treatment of hate speech in international law, which has already been partially destroyed through the &#8220;competent&#8221; reasonings in previous cases (See, for example, Kordic and Cerkez Trial Judgment, para. 209). </p>
<p>At least we will have 100000000 pages of Seselj&#8217;s views on 21st century racial theory written at the expense of the ICTY.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
