<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chatham House Discussion on the ICC Review Conference</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ejiltalk.org/chatham-house-discussion-on-the-icc-review-conference/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ejiltalk.org/chatham-house-discussion-on-the-icc-review-conference/</link>
	<description>Blog of the European Journal of International Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:55:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mihai Martoiu Ticu</title>
		<link>http://www.ejiltalk.org/chatham-house-discussion-on-the-icc-review-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-2168</link>
		<dc:creator>Mihai Martoiu Ticu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 14:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ejiltalk.org/?p=2367#comment-2168</guid>
		<description>I understand that the understandings of the parties might be used in the future by a court of law to interpret the statute, but what about the understandings the U.S. produced? Could they have any significance?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand that the understandings of the parties might be used in the future by a court of law to interpret the statute, but what about the understandings the U.S. produced? Could they have any significance?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

