magnify
Home EJIL Analysis Al-Skeini and Al-Jedda in Strasbourg

Al-Skeini and Al-Jedda in Strasbourg

Published on August 29, 2011        Author: 

I’ve posted on SSRN an article which will be published in the EJIL next year on Al-Skeini and Al-Jedda before the European Court of Human Rights. The pre-print draft will be available on SSRN until the article comes out in the Journal. The abstract is below, and comments are welcome, as always.

The article analyses the European Court of Human Rights’ recent judgments in Al-Skeini v. United Kingdom and Al-Jedda v. United Kingdom. The former is set to become the leading Strasbourg authority on the extraterritorial application of the ECHR; the latter presents significant developments with regard to issues such as the dual attribution of conduct to states and to international organizations, norm conflict, the relationship between the ECHR and general international law, and the ability or inability of UN Security Council decisions to displace human rights treaties by virtue of Article 103 of the UN Charter. The article critically examines the reasoning behind the two judgments, as well as their broad policy implications regarding ECHR member state action abroad and their implementation of various Security Council measures.

Print Friendly
 

One Response

  1. “displace human rights treaties”? but surely not customary human rights law that is binding on the United Nations, and all of its organs, under Article 55(c) of the U.N. Charter, if not also through Articles 1(3), 24(2), and 25 of the Charter.
    see, e.g., http://ssrn.com/abstract=1710744